Michael Venner

The Department of the Environment Northern Ireland (DOENI) has consulted on proposals to make site waste management plans (SWMP) a legal requirement for certain construction and demolition projects in Northern Ireland.

The consultation closed on 11 March 2011. The regulations will be called The Site Waste Management Plans Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2011 and are expected to come into force in autumn 2011.

Who will the Site Waste Management Plans Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2011 affect?

If you are involved in construction, demolition or excavation projects, with an estimated cost greater than £300,000, you will be affected by the new regulations and will be required to prepare a SWMP. The regulations will include all methods of construction, including civil engineering, modifications to existing constructions, site preparation, on-site pre-fabrication and work relating to utilities.

What is a site waste management plan?

A SWMP is a plan that details the amount and type of waste that will be produced on a construction site and how it will be reused, recycled or disposed of. The plan must be updated during the construction process.

There are additional requirements if the cost of the project is greater than £500,000.

Who will be responsible for the SWMP?

The client and principal contractor will be responsible for the SWMP. They must ensure sub-contractors employed on the site are aware of and comply with the key waste management controls.

What happens next?

The DOENI will consider the responses received to the consultation and use them to develop the proposals. The regulations should come into force in autumn 2011.

The above information is courtesy of Netregs.

Need ISO 14001 certification to help demonstrate you are legally compliant and maintain an Environmental Management System? Visit the IMS website for a free, no obligation quotation and further information on the requirements of the standard.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Organisations applying the new revisions of AS9100 and AS9120 will notice that they are being required to provide a greater volume of information prior to any on-site activities being performed.

Auditors (internal and External) are less likely to be effective if they have not performed suitable planning for the on-site audits.  Planning will assist the auditor to keep the audit focused during the on-site audit and provide a true “process-based” audit.

Some of the additional information required (as per AS9101) by IMS or any other CB prior to the on-site audits being planned and performed will include:

  • The revenue for aviation, space, and defense industry, as a proportion of the total revenue;
  • the number of employees working for aviation, space and defense and the total workforce; and
  • identification of the major (e.g., top five) aviation, space and defense customers.

The above information will be used to help the auditor plan their audit and focus on the key areas of the organisation, thus providing a more effective audit.  There is no benefit to the organisation or their clients by focusing the audit within areas which could potentially have the least impact to the risks of the business, clients or aerospace industry.

If Boeing is your top customer, the auditor will focus their audit on the orders processed for them and the controls you have in place throughout that process.

Some organisations have questioned why we require the information stated above and we hope that this blog has clarified the reasoning behind this.  An update will be required on an annual basis to ensure the auditor continues to focus their efforts in the right direction.

The IMS Form (AS9100 and AS9120 Supplemental Questionnaire) used to provide this information can be found on the IMS Website.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

AS9101 clause 4.3.2.2 requires the Certification Body Auditor to ensure clients provide the necessary information and documentation for review, including the following:

  • Quality Manual;
  • Description of processes showing their sequence and interaction, including the identification of any outsourced processes;

Note 1: The processes can be depicted in various ways [e.g., process maps, turtle diagrams, SIPOC method (breakdown of supplier, inputs, process steps/tasks, outputs, customer), octopus].

Organisations shall be required to provide this information during the stage 1 assessment or a document review for the auditor to review and use as the basis for the audit plan.  There is no defined method for depicting this information but some common tools are detailed within Note 1 or organisations can create their own.

Whatever tool is used, the organisation must ensure that the process approach which has been defined within a previous blog is being utilised [i.e. inputs, process, outputs).

The auditor is also likely to produce their own tools for use, these can also be used as part of your own internal audit process.

Some of the tools used by the IMS auditors can be downloaded from the IMS Website.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Many of the ISO standards are designed around the process approach to auditing and design of the management system and takes you away from clause based systems.

Organisations who introduce ISO 9001, AS9100, AS9120, AS9110 etc need to ensure their management systems are utilising the Plan Do Check Act definitions and steer away from clause based auditing and system design.  This is also relevant to organisations implementing other standards such as ISO 14001.

Within ISO 9000, the definition of a process is: A set of interrelated or interacting activities which transforms inputs into outputs.

Inputs to a process are generally outputs from other processes and a process has a start and an end defined by two limits and must be considered when defining your own processes.

Within ISO 9001 and AS9100, clause 4.1 requires organisations to (e) monitor, measure where applicable, and analyse these processes, and (f) implement actions necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of these processes.

The above clause is very important and is commonly overlooked by organisations and auditors.  Many organisations applying AS9100, AS9120 or AS9110 will be aware of the the new Process Effectiveness Assessment Report (PEAR) form which auditors shall begin to use during assessments.  These Reports are very important and will identify if your processes have been clearly defined and are suitably monitored and measured.  Further information on the PEAR shall be included within a separate blog.

Tools can be used to help organisations define their processes, these shall also be detailed within a separate blog but some example tools can be process flowcharts, SIPOCs and Turtle Diagrams.

Taking the above information, organisations need to ensure that their processes have been clearly defined with inputs and outputs and showing the interaction of these processes.  Measuring the effectiveness of the process is also vitally important and non-conformance’s shall be raised if these processes are found to be ineffective.

You can be in compliance with a clause of ISO 9001 or the Aerospace Standards but still be non-conforming if you are not monitoring and measuring a defined process and taking corrective actions against any areas which are outside of the defined requirements or targets.

A prime example of this could be late deliveries, if you have a process for delivering products within a defined time frame and you are late or outside of that requirement then a non-conformance’s should be raised internally and corrective actions taken.

Please note that this is a requirement of ISO 9001 not just the aerospace standards.  Review clause 4.1 carefully and consider your processes and how you are defining, monitoring and measuring those processes.

If you need to download some process tools or the PEAR form visit the IMS website.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Due to the release of the new revisions of AS9100 and AS9120 the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) have published a number of Frequently Asked Questions Documents.

It is recommened that you download these documents as there are a number of clarification points within these documents which will help to further explain not only the requirements of the standard but also the requirements and purpose of the AS9101D document.

The FAQs are free to download from the IMS website and are written by clause which makes them more user friendly. The auditors will also use these during the audits as an aid.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

IMS is experiencing high growth within the aerospace industry and require some additional sub-contract auditors for the AS9100 and AS9120 standards.

If you are interested or know of anyone who would be interested then please contact IMS through the contact details on our website.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

Its many years behind schedule and Millions of Dollars over budget but it looks like the Boeing 787 Dreamliner is finally about to take off.  The Dreamliner is approximately 50% composite which is relatively new technology when applied to the aerospace industry and probably a large factor in the delays to the aircraft.

I wonder if Boeing get in trouble for late deliveries as I know their suppliers get in trouble?

At an event at Boeing’s facility in Everett, Washington, Administrator Babbitt presented Boeing executives with two certificates for the design and production of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner with Rolls-Royce engines.

“Today’s achievement could not have been possible without the professionalism and dedication of the FAA team involved in the certification,” said Administrator Babbitt. “The engineers, inspectors and flight test pilots all worked diligently to ensure our high safety standards were met.”

Boeing made its initial application to the FAA on March 28, 2003 and the program was launched in April 2004. The first 787 rollout ceremony was on July 8, 2007 at Boeing’s Everett assembly factory. The airplane first flew on Dec. 15, 2009, and the six flight test airplanes have since accumulated more than 4,645 flight hours, with approximately 25 percent of those hours flown by FAA flight test crews. More than 200,000 hours were logged by FAA technical experts who were involved in the type certification of the 787.

The airplane will use 20 percent less fuel and produce less noise compared to similarly sized airplanes. It was designed and manufactured by suppliers and partners around the world and integrated at final assembly. The 787 incorporates many capabilities of the nation’s Next Generation Air Transportation System, or NextGen.

The European Safety Agency (EASA) also issued a same day validation of the FAA Type Certificate of the 787.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) issued on Friday 26 August 2011 to Boeing a Type Certificate for the Boeing 787-8 aircraft. This EASA certificate recognises that Boeing has demonstrated compliance to the EASA Type Certification Basis with applicable airworthiness and environmental requirements.

When handing over EASA type-certificate to Boeing, Patrick Goudou, EASA Executive Director said: “This is a great achievement. I am particularly proud of the dedication and efficiency demonstrated by EASA certification teams in dealing with new certification challenges such as the use of composite material which account for more than 50% of the aircraft’s primary structure”.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and EASA worked closely together during the certification of the aircraft, the FAA being the primary authority for all American designs, and EASA the validating authority. Boeing received the FAA Type Certificate simultaneously at a joint ceremony organised Friday in Seattle.

Type certification is a prerequisite to the first delivery to airline customers. The Boeing 787-8 has now completed all certification requirements prior to its entry into service later this year with the Japanese Airline All Nippon Airways (ANA). The first European airline to operate the Boeing 787-8 will be Poland’s national carrier LOT with the first delivery expected in March 2012.

The Boeing 787-8 can carry between 210 and 250 passengers over a distance of 7,650-8,200 nautical miles (14,200-15,200 km). Its in-service record will now be monitored through continuing airworthiness activities.

Above information is courtesy of EASA.

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

BREEAM is an environmental assessment method and rating system for buildings and now has over 200,000 buildings with certified BREEAM assessment ratings and over a million registered for assessment since it was first launched in 1990.  Many clients of IMS apply the BREEAM requirements to their management systems and in some cases have achieved considerable energy and cost savings by introducing the requirements.

BREEAM sets the standard for best practice in sustainable building design, construction and operation and has become one of the most comprehensive and widely recognised measures of a building’s environmental performance.

A BREEAM assessment uses recognised measures of performance, which are set against established benchmarks, to evaluate a building’s specification, design, construction and use and will begin from the planning stage.  The measures used represent a broad range of categories and criteria from energy to ecology and include aspects related to energy and water use, the internal environment (health and well-being), pollution, transport, materials, waste, ecology and management processes.

An initial assessment establishes the potential performance of the building and this is monitored and improved throughout the project to receive a full score at the end.  The scoring mechanism is stringent and to achieve a good or excellent rating is a significant achievement.

A Certificated BREEAM assessment is delivered by a licensed organisation, using assessors trained under a UKAS accredited competent person scheme, at various stages in a buildings life cycle. This provides clients, developers, designers and others with:

  • market recognition for low environmental impact buildings,
  • confidence that tried and tested environmental practice is incorporated in the building,
  • inspiration to find innovative solutions that minimise the environmental impact,
  • a benchmark that is higher than regulation,
  • a system to help reduce running costs, improve working and living environments,
  • a standard that demonstrates progress towards corporate and organisational environmental objectives.

Clients, planners development agencies, funders and developers use BREEAM to specify the sustainability performance of their buildings in a way that is quick, comprehensive, highly visible in the marketplace and provides a level playing field.

Property agents use it to promote the environmental credentials and benefits of a building to potential purchasers and tenants.

Design teams use it as a method to improve the performance of their buildings and their own experience and knowledge of environmental aspects of sustainability.

Managers use it to reduce running costs, measure and improve the performance of buildings, empower staff, develop action plans and monitor and report performance at both the single building and portfolio level.

For Further information visit the BREEAM website

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)

ISO 50001 Energy Management Systems will establish a framework for industrial plants, commercial facilities or entire organizations to manage energy.  Targeting broad applicability across national economic sectors, the standard could influence up to 60 % of the world’s energy use.

Energy is critical to organisational operations and can be a major cost, whatever the activities.  An idea can be gained by considering the use of energy through the supply chain of a business, from raw materials through to recycling and thinking about not only the cost impact but the environmental impact.

ISO 50001 will provide public and private sector organisations with management strategies to increase energy efficiency, reduce costs and improve energy performance.

The standard is intended to provide organisations with a recognised framework for integrating energy performance into their management practices and can be integrated with ISO 9001, 14001 and OHSAS 18001 due to its common elements.

For further information on the ISO 50001:2011 standard, download the publication from the ISO Standards website here

 

Digg This
Reddit This
Stumble Now!
Buzz This
Vote on DZone
Share on Facebook
Bookmark this on Delicious
Kick It on DotNetKicks.com
Shout it
Share on LinkedIn
Bookmark this on Technorati
Post on Twitter
Google Buzz (aka. Google Reader)
© 2010 IMS International LLP Blog To go back to the main site www.imsworld.org Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha